By Jamiu Folarin
In 2017, a
colleague at one of the State broadcasting stations in Ogun State lost her
father to the cold hands of the death.
It was gathered
that the old man did not survive the shock from the announcement that his house
will be demolished to pave way for road construction in the State capital.
Last week, the
younger brother of my father visited our family house saying he is now a
“walking corpse”.
He lamented that in
June 2017, he lost three storey buildings (hotel, residential house and
shopping mall) to the road construction in Akute, Ifo Local Government Area of
the State.
Despite acquiring
the land legally from Ogun State Property and Investment Corporation (OPIC)
with an authentic CofO, compensation is yet to be paid despite numerous
appeals.
This week, a cleric
in my neighbourhood (Sabo, Abeokuta) and his septuagenarian mother were given
three days notice to vacate their house to pave way for the supposed expansion
of Abattoir at Sabo, Abeokuta.
The old woman had
been crying all day since the announcement.
I just pray that
the grandma will survive the agony of an attempt to render her homeless in a
number of days.
These are few of
the sorrow stories associated with road constructions in Ogun State.
There are countless
untold ones.
I cannot in any way
fault the decision of the Ogun State Government to embark on massive
infrastructural development in the State.
Fortunately, I was
actively involved in the reportage of the massive campaign of Senator Ibikunle
Amosun in all the 20 Local Government Areas (if not the 234 wards) in Ogun
State during the 2011 general elections.
The then candidate
of Action Congress of Nigerian (ACN) did not mince words on his resolve to turn
Ogun State to “mini Dubai”.
I was privileged to
be in attendance at one of the first official engagements of the governor in
2011 during the official opening of a world-class pharmaceutical company in
Ogun State attended by the former governor of Lagos State, Mr Babatunde Raji
Fashola.
Fashola was the
cynosure of all eyes at that event due to his remarkable achievements in
infrastructural development in Lagos State.
In fact, Gov.
Amosun acknowledged the encomium rained on Fashola asking Nigerians to reserve
some of the adjectives of praises for him as he embarked on his “Rebuilding
Mission”.
Senator Amosun
explained that his plan for the infrastructural development of the State will
be unparallel in the history of the State and if not Nigeria.
No doubt, the
governor is working round the clock to fulfil his electioneering promises
especially in the area of infrastructural development.
My observation and
analysis of the discussions in the public sphere (physical and virtual)
indicated that there are no opponents to the “Rebuilding Mission” in terms of
massive road construction in Ogun State.
This was what some
observers described as the “Construction Site of Nigeria”.
The theme of the
opposition messages was mainly the methodology or approach adopted by Senator
Ibikunle Amosun administration to the infrastructural development.
This is the area
the governor and his team needed to make adjustment and amendment if this
government intends to get the “reserved” adjectives of praises rained on former
governor Fashola.
The gains of the
massive infrastructural development in Ogun State are evident just as its
pains.
Ogun State now
prides itself on housing the largest manufacturing companies in Nigeria.
When companies are
folding up in different parts of Nigeria due to the unfriendly business
environment; more are springing up in the Gateway State.
This has reduced
the unemployment rate in the State and improved its security climate.
It is also on
record that the man-hour people of the State loss to heavy traffic in the intra
and intercity journey has been reduced to its barest minimum.
In fact, my first
car did not survive six months when I had to change the entire engine partly
due to the deplorable state of roads in Abeokuta.
According to the
reports of the Federal Road Safety Corp (FRSC), before the intervention of the
Amosun-led administration on road construction in 2012, there were increases in
the number of death from bad road induced accidents.
This has also
reduced over the years. It is however not worthy to replace one form of death
with another.
Ogun State is
referred to as “Civil Service State” because the government is the largest
employer of labour.
The present
administration has partly changed the narrative by providing enabling environment
through massive infrastructural development thereby encouraging the growth of
Macro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in the State.
This is expected to
serve as catalyst to sustainable economic development, poverty alleviation and
employment generation.
One of the
downsides of road construction and infrastructural development in the State is
that it has temporarily and if not permanently rendered some petty traders and
retailers in popular markets across the State jobless.
The modern shopping
complex is said not to be within the reach of these traders.
It is therefore not
right to replace one form of economic hardship with another.
What would have
happened if the Amosun-led administration did not take this giant stride to
change the face of infrastructure in the State?
The socio-cultural
and economic situations in the State would have worsened.
The All Progressive
Congress (APC) candidates in the 2015 general elections in Ogun State would not
have received the favour of the electorates who massively voted for the party.
Is it not
appropriate for the present administration to take the bull by its horn by
listening attentively to the cries of the “walking corpses” and appease the
dead (those who died resulting from the infrastructural development)?
The manner in which
quit notices were served on those affected by road construction and subsequent
demolition of their property needed to be reviewed.
A situation where
you announced that people’s property will be demolished without considering the
psychological trauma this announcement will cause is inhuman.
Though I witnessed
the enlightenments embarked upon by the governor on the affected areas but
little was done to ameliorate the suffering and hardship of these people.
The government
needed to do a follow-up to ascertain how peoples are coping with the trauma
they were subjected to due to the demolition.
It is not even out
of place to have dedicated trauma centres and Internally Displaced Peoples’
(IDP) Camps across the State for those affected by the infrastructural projects
of the government.
How do you also
describe a scenario where properties were demolished after few days of quit
notice only for the government not to commence work on the site for years?
Why are you in a
haste to demolish people’s property without giving them enough time to
relocate?
Why not pay
compensation before commencing demolishing exercises to serve as a temporary
succour?
It must also be
stated that government is not wholly responsible for some of the agonies of the
victims of demolished structures across the State.
Some of them are
self-imposed.
As responsible
citizens, we must begin to change our attitude and orientation on doing the
right thing at the right time.
It is not ideal to
acquire landed property without confirming its status from the Bureau of Lands
and Survey.
What do you expect
when you build on land that had been acquired by the government?
We must support the
“Building Right” programme of the government.
This is the
preventive measure for us, at least to have the moral justification to question
any unpopular decisions and draconian policies of the government.
How do you also
explain a situation whereby people deliberately encroached on government
property?
Or situation where
people deliberately disregard the right of ways by building both residential
and shopping complexes on road set-backs?
My experience as a
reporter while covering some of these issues revealed that those who build on
land under acquisition by the government or build without approved plans have
the mindset that they would be “pardoned” by the government if they blackmail
the officials championing the move to do things right.
For instance, the
government amnesty termed “Home Owners Charter” offered by the Amosun-led
administration to those who built without the approval of the appropriate
government agencies was not extended to those who encroached on land under the
acquisition of the government.
I was under intense
pressure by these set of people to report that the Home Owner Charter was a
sham.
Just as we are
appealing to the State government to inject human feelings in the
implementation of its projects, programmes and policies; we must also learn to
act responsibly in our dealings with the government.
In all, I support
the massive infrastructural development especially in terms of road
construction in Ogun State.
I am also at home
with the argument of “No Pain, No Gain”.
I am however not in
support of people of Ogun State paying the supreme sacrifice (death) in an
attempt to put up road infrastructure.
No life is worth
sacrificing for infrastructural development.
And there is no
section in the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic Nigeria (as amended)
to put to death (overtly or covertly) those encroaching on government land or
violates the building regulations.
I also doubt if
such appears in any extant laws in Ogun State.
The government must
do everything within its power to ensure that no life will further be lost to
its road construction.
Prompt payment of
compensation, provision of temporary relocation, adequate grace period for quit
notices, special preferences to the poor and referral of victims to trauma
centres and IDP camps are the least the government can do to stop further death
and explosion in the numbers of “living corpses” in Ogun State due to its
massive infrastructural development termed “Rebuilding Mission”.
Jamiu Folarin is a
community reporter with Connected Development (CODE), and lectures at the
Department of Mass Communication, Crescent University, Abeokuta, Ogun State.
He can be reached through folarinjamiu@gmail.com,
+2347033773993.

No comments:
Post a Comment